The trauma pelvic X-ray: Not all pelvic fractures are created equally

Am J Surg. 2022 Jul;224(1 Pt B):489-493. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Abstract

Background: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the initial pelvic X-ray in identifying significant pelvic fractures, which could result in changes in the management of the patient.

Methods: Patients admitted to a level I trauma center (2010-2019) with a severe blunt pelvic fracture (AIS ≥3) were identified. Included in the analysis were patients who underwent emergency department pelvic X-ray followed by CT scan. A control group of patients without pelvic fractures was also included in the study. All investigations were reviewed by a blinded attending trauma radiologist. Pelvic X-ray findings and CT scan reports were compared according to the specific pelvic fracture location, and severity.

Results: Overall, pelvic X-ray was diagnosed 252 of the 285 pelvic fractures (sensitivity 88.4%) and wrongly diagnosed a facture in 3 of 97 patients without a fracture (specificity 96.9%). In 29/184 (15.8%) of patients with pelvic fracture AIS 3, the pelvic X-ray was read as normal, missing the fracture, compared with 4/101 (4.0%) in the AIS 4/5 group (p = 0.003). Pelvic X-ray had the lowest sensitivity in ischial (10.7%), iliac (28.7%), acetabular (42.4%), and sacral fractures (49.1%) and was best for detecting symphysis diastasis (89.8%).

Conclusion: Pelvic X-ray is useful in identifying pubic symphysis diastasis. However, it misses or underestimates a significant number of fractures. CT scan evaluation should be performed in patients with a suspicious mechanism or clinical suspicion of pelvic fracture.

Keywords: Accuracy; CT-scan; Pelvic X-ray; Sensitivity; Specificity.

MeSH terms

  • Fractures, Bone* / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Pelvic Bones* / diagnostic imaging
  • Pelvic Bones* / injuries
  • Radiography
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Spinal Fractures* / diagnostic imaging
  • X-Rays