What is known and objective: In the absence of head-to-head comparisons, the objective of this study was to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to indirectly compare the relative efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for ulcerative colitis (UC).
Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library from the database inception until 13 August 2021. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that directly compared these interventions were identified. Therefore, a fixed-effects Bayesian NMA was conducted by identifying a connected (via comparison to placebo) network of RCTs. Ranking was assessed using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities.
Results and discussion: Seven RCTs including 3190 patients met the inclusion criteria. Filgotinib 100 mg was ranked highest for induction of endoscopic remission (SUCRA, 0.67) whereas peficitinib 75 mg BID was ranked highest for induction of clinical response (SUCRA, 0.72). Peficitinib 75 mg was ranked highest for induction of mucosal healing (SUCRA, 0.71), whereas peficitinib 150 mg was ranked highest for clinical remission (SUCRA, 0.74). Tofacitinib 3 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment in terms of change from baseline in Mayo score (SUCRA, 0.78). Adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuations or withdrawals from the study due to AEs did not differ between JAK inhibitors and placebo groups.
What is new and conclusion: Based on indirect comparisons, peficitinib 75 mg/75 mg BID/150 mg, tofacitinib 3 mg and filgotinib 100mg were the most efficacious JAK inhibitor interventions in patients with UC. However, head-to-head trials are warranted to inform clinical decision-making with greater confidence.
Keywords: Janus kinase inhibitors; network meta-analysis; systematic review; ulcerative colitis.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.