Cost-effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII Fc versus emicizumab for prophylaxis in adults and adolescents with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK

Eur J Haematol. 2023 Mar;110(3):262-270. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13901. Epub 2022 Dec 11.

Abstract

Introduction: The economic and clinical burden of haemophilia A is high. Primary prophylaxis with factor VIII replacement therapy is the recognised standard of care, but the emergence of non-factor therapies, such as emicizumab, is extending treatment options for people with haemophilia A.

Aim: There are currently no direct comparisons of efficacy or cost between recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor FVIII Fc-fusion protein referred to herein as rFVIIIFc) and emicizumab; therefore, a cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare prophylactic treatment with rFVIIIFc versus emicizumab in patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the UK.

Methods: The cost-effectiveness model was based on a matching-adjusted indirect comparison and included male patients, aged ≥12 years, with haemophilia A without inhibitors. The model was designed as a Markov process with a flexible lifelong time horizon, and cost-effectiveness was presented as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Base-case analysis and sensitivity analyses (including scenario analyses, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis [DSA] and probability sensitivity analysis [PSA]) were performed using the following treatment strategies: individualised prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc and prophylaxis with emicizumab administered once weekly (scenario analyses used regimens of once every 2 weeks or once every 4 weeks).

Results: Base-case analysis, DSA and PSA indicated that, compared with emicizumab administered once weekly, rFVIIIFc individualised prophylaxis was the dominant treatment strategy, with lower costs, a greater number of quality-adjusted life years, and a lower number of bleeds.

Conclusions: rFVIIIFc has proven efficacy and is cost-effective compared with emicizumab, providing clinicians with a viable treatment option to improve the health outcomes for adults and adolescents with haemophilia A in the UK.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness analysis; emicizumab; haemophilia A; prophylaxis; recombinant factor VIII Fc.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Factor VIII* / therapeutic use
  • Hemophilia A* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen / therapeutic use
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins / therapeutic use
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • Factor VIII
  • emicizumab
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Grants and funding