Diagnostic and functional outcomes of adjustment disorder in U.S. active duty service members

Abstract

Background: Adjustment disorder (AD) is a commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorder. However, little is known about its course, predictors of its diagnostic outcomes, or its association with functional impairment. Our primary aim was to examine diagnostic transitions of service members with an incident AD diagnosis (IADx) to one of three states: 1) another psychiatric diagnosis, 2) chronic AD, or 3) no psychiatric diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included predictors of diagnostic course and functional outcomes associated with follow-up diagnoses.

Methods: Health records of a random sample of 10,720 service members with an IADx were analyzed using multinomial logit regression and hazard rate model with competing risks.

Results: IADx transitions were 24.3 % to another psychiatric diagnosis, 8.9 % with chronic AD, and 43.7 % without a diagnosis. Nearly a quarter (23.1 %) separated from service. Deployment was the strongest predictor of transitioning to another diagnosis. Those who transitioned to another diagnosis separated at an increased rate and with more adverse outcomes.

Limitations: Diagnostic findings are based on data in the electronic health record, and we could not specifically identify the stressor that precipitated an AD diagnosis. These findings describe the course of AD in military personnel and may not generalize to civilians.

Conclusions: AD, as initially diagnosed, represents a heterogeneous disorder with an enduring impact across the military career for a considerable proportion of service members. As an early indicator of more severe psychiatric outcomes, an IADx may signal an opportunity for early intervention and screening, particularly in service members with a history of deployment.

Keywords: Active duty service members; Adjustment disorder; Disease course; Functional impairment.