Efficacy and safety of pyronaridine-artesunate versus artemether-lumefantrine in the treatment of acute uncomplicated malaria in children in South-West Nigeria: an open-labelled randomized controlled trial

Malar J. 2023 May 13;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04574-7.

Abstract

Background: In Nigeria, declining responsiveness to artemether-lumefantrine (AL), the artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) of choice since 2005, has been reported. Pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) is a newer fixed-dose ACT recently prequalified by the WHO for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. However, PA data from the Nigerian pediatric population is scarce. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of PA and AL using the WHO 28-day anti-malarial therapeutic efficacy study protocol in Ibadan, southwest Nigeria, were compared.

Methods: In an open-labelled, randomized, controlled clinical trial, 172 children aged 3-144 months with a history of fever and microscopically confirmed uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were enrolled in southwest Nigeria. Enrollees were randomly assigned to receive PA or AL at standard dosages according to body weight for 3 days. Venous blood was obtained for hematology, blood chemistry, and liver function tests on days 0, 3, 7, and 28 as part of the safety evaluation.

Results: 165 (95.9%) of the enrolled individuals completed the study. About half (52.3%; 90/172) of enrollees were male. Eighty-seven (50.6%) received AL, while 85 (49.4%) received PA. Day 28, adequate clinical and parasitological response for PA was 92.7% [(76/82) 95% CI 83.1, 95.9] and 71.1% [(59/83) 95% CI 60.4, 79.9] for AL (0.001). Fever and parasite clearance were similar in both groups. Two of six and eight of 24 parasite recurrences were observed among PA- and AL-treated children, respectively. PCR-corrected Day-28 cure rates for PA were 97.4% (76/78) and 88.1% (59/67) for AL (= 0.04) in the per-protocol population after new infections were censored. Hematological recovery at day 28 was significantly better among PA-treated patients (34.9% 2.8) compared to those treated with AL (33.1% 3.0) (0.002). Adverse events in both treatment arms were mild and similar to the symptoms of malaria infection. Blood chemistry and liver function tests were mostly within normal limits, with an occasional marginal rise.

Conclusion: PA and AL were well-tolerated. PA was significantly more efficacious than AL in both the PCR-uncorrected and PCR-corrected per-protocol populations during this study. The results of this study support the inclusion of PA in the anti-malarial treatment guidelines in Nigeria.

Retrospective trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05192265.

Keywords: Artemether–lumefantrine; Efficacy and safety; Nigeria; Pyronaridine–artesunate; Randomized clinical trial; Uncomplicated malaria.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Antimalarials* / adverse effects
  • Artemether / therapeutic use
  • Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination / therapeutic use
  • Artemisinins* / adverse effects
  • Child
  • Drug Combinations
  • Ethanolamines / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Fluorenes / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Malaria, Falciparum* / drug therapy
  • Male
  • Nigeria
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antimalarials
  • pyronaridine tetraphosphate, artesunate drug combination
  • Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination
  • Artemisinins
  • Artemether
  • Drug Combinations
  • Ethanolamines
  • Fluorenes

Supplementary concepts

  • Acute malaria

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05192265