Background: Although pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), several studies have illustrated clinical benefits associated with PVI with posterior wall isolation (PWI).
Methods: This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of PVI alone versus PVI+PWI performed using the cryoballoon in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and paroxysmal AF (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF).
Results: Acute PVI was achieved in all patients using cryoballoon ablation. Compared to PVI alone, PVI+PWI was associated with longer cryoablation, fluoroscopy, and total procedure times. Adjunct radiofrequency was required to complete PWI in 29/77 patients (37.7%). Adverse events were similar with PVI alone versus PVI+PWI. But at 24 ± 7 months of follow-up, not only cryoballoon PVI+PWI was associated with improved freedom from recurrent AF (74.3% vs. 46.0%, P = .007) and all atrial tachyarrhythmias (71.4% vs. 38.1%, P = .001) in patients with PersAF, cryoballoon PVI+PWI also yielded greater freedom from AF (88.1% vs. 63.7%, P = .003) and all atrial tachyarrhythmias (83.3% vs. 60.8%, P = .008) in those with PAF. Additionally, PVI+PWI was associated with higher reductions in atrial tachyarrhythmia burden (97.9% vs. 91.6%, P < .001), need for cardioversion (5.2% vs. 23.6%, P < .001) and repeat catheter ablation (10.4% vs. 26.1%, P = .005), and a longer time-to-arrhythmia recurrence (16 ± 6 months vs. 8 ± 5 months, P < .001) in both PersAF and PAF patients.
Conclusion: In CIED patients with PersAF or PAF, cryoballoon PVI+PWI is associated with a greater freedom from recurrent AF and atrial tachyarrhythmias, as compared to PVI alone during long-term follow-up.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardiac implantable electronic device; cryoballoon; posterior wall isolation; pulmonary vein isolation.
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.