Comparative efficacy between retrograde intrarenal surgery with vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized controlled study

Qing-Lai Tang; Ping Liang; Ye-Fei Ding; Xing-Zhu Zhou; Rong-Zhen Tao

doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1200717

Comparative efficacy between retrograde intrarenal surgery with vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized controlled study

Front Surg. 2023 Jul 7:10:1200717. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1200717. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Qing-Lai Tang^#¹, Ping Liang^#², Ye-Fei Ding^#³, Xing-Zhu Zhou¹, Rong-Zhen Tao¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Urology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
² Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, Nanjing, China.
³ Department of Urology, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, China.

^# Contributed equally.

Abstract

Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery combined with vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (V-UAS) and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in patients with 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stone.

Patients and methods: A total of 173 patients with 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stone were prospectively randomized into two groups. Eighty-six in the V-UAS group and 87 cases as control in the MPCNL group. The SFRs at different times (Postoperative 1 day, 2nd week and 4th week) was considered as the primary outcome of the study. The secondary end points were operative time, postoperative hospital stay and operative complications.

Results: There was no obvious difference between two groups in patients' demographics and preoperative clinical characteristics (all P > 0.05). Postoperative data showed that the SFR at postoperative 1 day in the V-UAS group was significantly lower than that in the MPCNL group (73.2% vs. 86.2%, P = 0.034). However, there was no statistical significance between two groups in SFRs during postoperative 2 weeks and 4 weeks (All P > 0.05). The levels of WBC, CRP and PCT were all significant lower in the V-UAS group than those in the MPCNL group at the postoperative 24 h and 48 h (all P < 0.05). Postoperative complications included fever (≥38.5°C), bleeding, pain and urosepsis. In terms of the rates of fever, pain and urosepsis, MPCNL group were all significantly higher than those in the V-UAS group (10.3 vs. 2.4%, P = 0.031; 14.9 vs. 2.4%, P = 0.003; 4.6 vs. 0.0%, P = 0.044; respectively). No significant difference was found between two groups in bleeding. Meanwhile, postoperative hospital stay in the V-UAS group was more shorten than that in the MPCNL group (3.7 vs. 5.9 days, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study showed that RIRS with V-UAS, a new partnership to treat 1-2 cm infectious upper ureteral stones, was satisfying as it achieved a high SFR rate and a low rate of infectious complications. This method was safe and reproducible in clinical practice.

Keywords: infectious; minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy; retrograde intrarenal surgery; upper ureteral stone; vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath.