Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Stent Optimisation in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;13(15):2612. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152612.

Abstract

Assessing coronary physiology after stent implantation facilitates the optimisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns can be characterised by the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) index. The impact of focal vs. diffuse disease on physiology-guided incremental optimisation strategy (PIOS) is unknown. This is a sub-study of the TARGET-FFR randomized clinical trial (NCT03259815). The study protocol directed that optimisation be attempted for patients in the PIOS arm when post-PCI FFR was <0.90. Overall, 114 patients (n = 61 PIOS and 53 controls) with both pre-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks and post-PCI FFR were included. A PPG ≥ 0.74 defined focal CAD. The PPG correlated significantly with post-PCI FFR (r = 0.43; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.57; p-value < 0.001) and normalised delta FFR (r = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62; p-value < 0.001). PIOS was more frequently applied to vessels with diffuse CAD (6% focal vs. 42% diffuse; p-value = 0.006). In patients randomized to PIOS, those with focal disease achieved higher post-PCI FFR than patients with diffuse CAD (0.93 ± 0.05 vs. 0.83 ± 0.07, p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between CAD patterns and the randomisation arm for post-PCI FFR (p-value for interaction = 0.004). Physiology-guided stent optimisation was applied more frequently to vessels with diffuse disease; however, patients with focal CAD at baseline achieved higher post-PCI FFR.

Keywords: PCI optimisation; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; pullback pressure gradient; revascularisation.

Grants and funding

This work was supported by endowment funds at the Golden Jubilee National Hospital (NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board) and the British Heart Foundation Research Excellence Awards (RE/18/6/34217 to C.B.). TARGET-FFR was an investigator-initiated trial sponsored by the Golden Jubilee Research Institute (NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.