How should we prioritise global surgery? A capabilities approach argument for the place of surgery within every health system

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov;8(11):e013100. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013100.

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving landscape of global health issues and policy, surgery has historically been sidelined due to concerns about high cost, complexity and other concerns including quantitatively less surgical disease burden in comparison to infectious disease or other health conditions. Now, in the context of pandemics, climate change, shrinking health budgets and other global health security concerns, the hard-won progress in raising the profile of surgical care is at risk, and a reconceptualisation is needed to maintain its position in global healthcare agendas. We challenge the long-standing ethical frameworks that underlie healthcare priority setting, namely cost-effectiveness analysis and human rights, that have contributed to surgery being sidelined for decades. They incompletely account for improvements to life quality and well-being that are possible through surgical healthcare systems. We argue for the Capabilities Approach as an alternative normative framework because it emphasises the moral importance of supporting every person's abilities to be and to do the things they value. Through this framework, we can produce a more comprehensive conception of healthcare that goes beyond biomedical health, and surgical healthcare would ultimately gain a higher priority in valuation of healthcare and non-healthcare interventions.

Keywords: Health policy; Health systems; Surgery.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Communicable Diseases*
  • Delivery of Health Care*
  • Global Health
  • Humans
  • Quality of Life