Acceptability and appropriateness of a risk-tailored organised melanoma screening program: Qualitative interviews with key informants

PLoS One. 2023 Dec 13;18(12):e0287591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287591. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Introduction: In Australia, opportunistic screening (occurring as skin checks) for the early detection of melanoma is common, and overdiagnosis is a recognised concern. Risk-tailored cancer screening is an approach to cancer control that aims to provide personalised screening tailored to individual risk. This study aimed to explore the views of key informants in Australia on the acceptability and appropriateness of risk-tailored organised screening for melanoma, and to identify barriers, facilitators and strategies to inform potential future implementation. Acceptability and appropriateness are crucial, as successful implementation will require a change of practice for clinicians and consumers.

Methods: This was a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Key informants were purposively selected to ensure expertise in melanoma early detection and screening, prioritising senior or executive perspectives. Consumers were expert representatives. Data were analysed deductively using the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist.

Results: Thirty-six participants were interviewed (10 policy makers; 9 consumers; 10 health professionals; 7 researchers). Key informants perceived risk-tailored screening for melanoma to be acceptable and appropriate in principle. Barriers to implementation included lack of trial data, reluctance for low-risk groups to not screen, variable skill level in general practice, differing views on who to conduct screening tests, confusing public health messaging, and competing health costs. Key facilitators included the perceived opportunity to improve health equity and the potential cost-effectiveness of a risk-tailored screening approach. A range of implementation strategies were identified including strengthening the evidence for cost-effectiveness, engaging stakeholders, developing pathways for people at low risk, evaluating different risk assessment criteria and screening delivery models and targeted public messaging.

Conclusion: Key informants were supportive in principle of risk-tailored melanoma screening, highlighting important next steps. Considerations around risk assessment, policy and modelling the costs of current verses future approaches will help inform possible future implementation of risk-tailored population screening for melanoma.

MeSH terms

  • Emotions
  • Health Care Costs
  • Health Personnel
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening
  • Melanoma* / diagnosis
  • Melanoma* / prevention & control
  • Qualitative Research

Grants and funding

This study received project grant funding awarded to AEC from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC #1165936) (NHMRC #2009923). AEC receives a NHMRC Investigator Grant (#2008454). KLAD receives an NHMRC Postgraduate Research Scholarship, NHMRC Supplementary Scholarship 2022 The University of Sydney and The Erik Mather PhD Scholarship (Melanoma Institute Australia). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.