Radial resection margin distinguishes between superficial versus deep resection in colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 30;18(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01836-7.

Abstract

Randomized studies showed that robotic surgery was short-term useful and safe for cancer patients. We investigated whether robots improve deep resection margins or superficial resection margins for radial resection margins in terms of short-term results. From an institutional database, we selected all superficial groups (≤ 3 mm) and deeper groups (≥ 4 mm) with rectal cancer treated with resection for a year. We evaluated the short-term post-operative 90-day outcomes on a radial resection size-based margin differentiation, including the first bowel movement, length of hospital stay, sepsis, and harvested lymph node. The main results were grades III-IV on the Clavien-Dindo scale and complications. We found 120 patients who had oncologic resection of rectal cancer; 42 patients with a superficial radial resection margin of ≤ 3 mm, all the following outcomes improved: the harvested lymph node, proximal resection margin, TME, flatus time, liquid diet duration, anastomotic leakage, and sepsis. Among these advantages were a reduced risk of metastasis and an overall reduction in local recurrence.

Keywords: Deep; Radial Margin; Rectal Cancer; Superficial.

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Margins of Excision
  • Rectal Neoplasms* / surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Sepsis*