Background: Hip fracture has a devastating impact on individuals and is an increasing burden for health systems and society. Compared to usual care, increased physiotherapy provision has demonstrated efficacy in improving patient and health service outcomes in this population. However, physiotherapy workforce challenges prevent sustained implementation.
Methods: Our aim was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness and implementation cost of thrice daily physiotherapy for patients in the acute care setting after hip fracture at two public hospitals. We added twice-daily exercise implemented by an alternative workforce, to usual care consisting of daily mobility practice by a physiotherapist. Sites identified their preferred alternative workforce, with pre-registration physiotherapy students and allied health assistants chosen. We used a mixed methods approach, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a determinant framework to guide implementation planning and data collection. We compared hospital length of stay data to a reference cohort.
Results: We recruited 25 patients during the study period. Acute care hospital length of stay decreased from 11 days in the reference cohort to 8 days in the BOOST cohort (mean difference - 3.3 days, 95%CI -5.4 to -1.2 days, p = 0.003). Intervention fidelity was 72% indicating feasibility, no safety concerns were attributed to the intervention, and uptake was 96% of all eligible patients. The intervention was acceptable to patients, carers and healthcare providers. This intervention was cost-effective from the acute orthopaedic service perspective.
Conclusion: Higher daily frequency of physiotherapy can be safely, feasibly and effectively implemented by an alternative workforce for patients in the acute care setting following hip fracture surgery.
Keywords: Health services research; Hip fracture; Implementation science; Mixed methods research; Physical therapy; Physiotherapy; Workforce.
© 2024. Crown.