Musculoskeletal model degrees of Freedom: Frontal plane constraints are hindering our understanding of human movement

Abstract

Induced acceleration analyses have expanded our understanding on the contributions of muscle forces to center of mass and segmental kinematics during a myriad of tasks. While these techniques have identified a subset of major muscle that contribute to locomotion, most analyses have included models with only one frontal plane degree of freedom (dof) actuated by the hip joint. The purpose of this study was to define the impact of including knee and subtalar joint frontal plane dof on model superposition accuracy and muscle specific contributions to mediolateral accelerations. Induced acceleration analyses were performed using OpenSim with the Lai model on a freely available dataset of one subject running at 4 m/s. Analyses were performed on four models (standard, with subtalar joint, with frontal plane knee, and combined frontal plane knee with subtalar) with the kinematic constraint and perturbation analyses. Root mean square error and correlations were computed against experimental kinematics. Adding frontal plane dofs improved mediolateral acceleration correlations on average by > 0.25 while only minimally impacting errors. The constraints method performed better than the perturbation method for mediolateral accelerations. Including frontal plane knee dof resulted in muscle and method specific responses. All muscles presented with a complete flip of polarity for constraint method, imparted by allowing the medial/lateral muscles to contribute according to their anatomical function. Only the gluteus medius flipped for the perturbation method. This study provides significant support for the inclusion of frontal plane knee and subtalar dof and the need for reevaluation of muscle contributions via induced acceleration.

Keywords: Frontal plane; Induced acceleration; Muscle acceleration; Musculoskeletal model.