Background: We aim to compare early surgical results between groups who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS) vs open first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis to treat end-stage hallux rigidus.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort review of 65 patients who underwent a first MTP fusion procedure at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2023. Success of fusion was determined radiographically. Postoperative complications were identified through medical record review.
Results: Sixty-seven first MTP fusion surgeries (41 open and 26 MIS) were performed on 65 patients with a primary diagnosis of hallux rigidus. Open surgery and MIS groups had similarly high fusion rates: 95% (39/41) and 96% (25/26), respectively (P = .84). We identified no difference in overall complication rates: 20% for open surgery and 23% for MIS (P = .73).
Conclusion: This retrospective analysis of 67 first MTP arthrodesis procedures showed no significant differences in fusion success or complications in the short term when comparing MIS to open surgery. Further studies are needed to elucidate potential differences between MIS vs open surgery.
Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Keywords: MIS; arthritis; arthrodesis; hallux disorders; hallux rigidus; minimally invasive; outcome studies.