The relationship between gender discrimination and wellbeing in middle-aged and older women

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0299381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299381. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that perceived gender discrimination negatively impacts mental wellbeing in young women.

Purpose: This study explored whether a similar relationship exists in middle-aged and older women.

Methods: A total of 3081 women (aged ≥52 years) from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing provided data on perceived gender discrimination in 2010/11. Depressive symptoms, loneliness, quality of life and life satisfaction were assessed in 2010/11 and in 2016/17.

Results: Perceived gender discrimination was reported by 282 (9.2%) participants. Cross-sectionally, women who perceived gender discrimination reported more depressive symptoms (β = 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.57) and had higher loneliness scores (β = 0.14, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.20) than women who did not perceive gender discrimination. They also reported significantly lower quality of life (β = -2.50, 95% CI -3.49 to -1.51) and life satisfaction (β = -1.07, 95% CI -1.81 to -0.33). Prospectively, perceived gender discrimination was associated with greater loneliness scores (β = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.14), as well as lower ratings of quality of life (β = -0.98, 95% CI -0.09 to -1.86), and life satisfaction (β = -1.04, 95% CI -0.34 to -1.74), independent of baseline values.

Conclusions: Middle-aged and older women who perceive gender discrimination report poorer mental wellbeing than those who do not perceive discrimination. Further, this type of discrimination may be predictive of declining mental wellbeing over time. These findings highlight the need for interventions to target gender-based discrimination to improve the wellbeing of women at mid- and older age.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aging
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Loneliness
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life*
  • Sexism*

Grants and funding

This study was supported by the Academy of Medical Sciences/the Wellcome Trust/ the Government Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy/the British Heart Foundation/Diabetes UK Springboard Award [SBF006\1036]. This funding was awarded to RAH. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. https://acmedsci.ac.uk/.