Sacubitril/Valsartan-Related Hypotension in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 May 7;83(18):1731-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.035. Epub 2024 Mar 25.

Abstract

Background: Hypotension is a potential adverse effect of sacubitril/valsartan, but there are limited data regarding the predictors and implications of treatment-related hypotension in heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

Objectives: We investigated predictors of treatment-associated hypotension, clinical outcomes after hypotension, and the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and incidence of hypotension in the PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial.

Methods: PARAGON-HF randomized patients with chronic HF (≥45%) to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. Following randomization, hypotension was defined as investigator-reported hypotension with a systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg. Predictors of hypotension were assessed using multivariable Cox models. Associations between hypotension and clinical outcomes were evaluated in time-updated Cox models. The relationship among treatment, LVEF, and incident rates of hypotension and clinical outcomes was estimated using Poisson regression models.

Results: Of 4,796 patients in PARAGON-HF, 637 (13%) experienced hypotension, more frequently in the sacubitril/valsartan arm (P < 0.001). Following documented hypotension, patients had higher risk of cardiovascular death and total HF hospitalizations (adjusted RR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.27-2.09; P < 0.001) and all-cause death (adjusted HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.28-2.05; P < 0.001). LVEF modified the association between sacubitril/valsartan and risk of hypotension (Pinteraction = 0.019) such that patients with LVEF ≥60% experienced substantially higher treatment-related risks of hypotension.

Conclusions: In PARAGON-HF, a higher LVEF was associated with an increased risk of hypotension in patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan. Because these subjects are also less likely to derive clinical benefit from sacubitril/valsartan, our data reinforce that the benefit/risk ratio favors the use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with LVEF below normal, but not at higher LVEF. (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711).

Keywords: blood pressure; heart failure; hypotension; sacubitril/valsartan.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aminobutyrates* / adverse effects
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists* / administration & dosage
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists* / adverse effects
  • Biphenyl Compounds*
  • Drug Combinations*
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / drug therapy
  • Heart Failure* / epidemiology
  • Heart Failure* / physiopathology
  • Humans
  • Hypotension* / chemically induced
  • Hypotension* / epidemiology
  • Hypotension* / physiopathology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume* / drug effects
  • Stroke Volume* / physiology
  • Tetrazoles / adverse effects
  • Valsartan* / adverse effects

Substances

  • Valsartan
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Aminobutyrates
  • Drug Combinations
  • sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Tetrazoles

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01920711