Development and Evaluation of an In-House Real-Time RT-PCR Targeting nsp10 Gene for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 21;25(6):3552. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063552.

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 mutations poses significant challenges to diagnostic tests, as these mutations can reduce the sensitivity of commonly used RT-PCR assays. Therefore, there is a need to design diagnostic assays with multiple targets to enhance sensitivity. In this study, we identified a novel diagnostic target, the nsp10 gene, using nanopore sequencing. Firstly, we determined the analytical sensitivity and specificity of our COVID-19-nsp10 assay. The COVID-19-nsp10 assay had a limit of detection of 74 copies/mL (95% confidence interval: 48-299 copies/mL) and did not show cross-reactivity with other respiratory viruses. Next, we determined the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19-nsp10 assay using 261 respiratory specimens, including 147 SARS-CoV-2-positive specimens belonging to the ancestral strain and Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, Mu, Eta, Kappa, Theta and Omicron lineages. Using a LightMix E-gene RT-PCR assay as the reference method, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the COVID-19-nsp10 assay were found to be 100%. The median Cp values for the LightMix E-gene RT-PCR and our COVID-19-nsp10 RT-PCR were 22.48 (range: 12.95-36.60) and 25.94 (range 16.37-36.87), respectively. The Cp values of the COVID-19-nsp10 RT-PCR assay correlated well with those of the LightMix E-gene RT-PCR assay (Spearman's ρ = 0.968; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, nsp10 is a suitable target for a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic; nsp10; real-time RT-PCR.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19 Testing
  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Humans
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • SARS-CoV-2* / genetics
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) Commissioned Research on Control of Infectious Disease (Phase IV), CID-HKU1-2. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of this study; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; or in the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript.