Cervical cancer prevention in Southern Africa: A review of national cervical cancer screening guidelines in the Southern African development community

R A Adams; M H Botha

doi:10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100477

Cervical cancer prevention in Southern Africa: A review of national cervical cancer screening guidelines in the Southern African development community

J Cancer Policy. 2024 Apr 7:40:100477. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100477. Online ahead of print.

Authors

R A Adams¹, M H Botha²

Affiliations

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Unit for Gynaecological Oncology, Clinical Building, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Francie Van Zijl, Stellenbosch University, 7505, South Africa. Electronic address: robynadams@sun.ac.za.
² Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Unit for Gynaecological Oncology, Clinical Building, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Francie Van Zijl, Stellenbosch University, 7505, South Africa.

PMID: 38593950
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100477

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer poses a significant burden, particularly in low-and-middle income countries (LMIC) with limited access to healthcare. High-income countries have made progress in prevention, while LMIC face unacceptably high incidence and mortality rates, often lacking official screening recommendations. We analysed the presence and content of cervical cancer screening guidelines for the secondary prevention of cervical cancer in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and compared it to the current World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention.

Methods: A review of national cervical cancer guidelines across the SADC region was conducted. Data was obtained from government websites, international cancer control platforms, and WHO resources. Search terms included "cervical cancer" and "cervical cancer control guidelines", amongst others. There were no limitations on publication years, and the most recent versions of the guidelines were analysed, regardless of language. Each guideline was assessed for specific screening and treatment recommendations, in relation to the current WHO guidelines. Points were assigned for each data element.

Results: While most countries contributed data to this analysis there was a notable absence of adherence to the WHO guidelines. The most common screening method was naked eye visual inspection. There was a consensus on the age of screening initiation. Most countries recommended treatment by cryotherapy and loop excision.

Conclusion: Effective cervical cancer screening programmes, guided by evidence-based recommendations, can enhance early intervention and outcomes. This study highlights the need for standardized and evidence-based cervical cancer screening guidelines in the SADC region, to reduce the burden of cervical cancer and improve the health outcomes of women in these areas.

Keywords: Cervical cancer prevention; SADC; Screening guidelines; WHO.

Publication types

Review