Healthcare resource utilization and associated costs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a real-world analysis using German claims data

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):531-542. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2331893. Epub 2024 Apr 19.

Abstract

Aims: This retrospective claims data study characterized real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in Germany.

Materials and methods: Continuously insured adults with incident mUC diagnosis (=index; ICD-10: C65-C68/C77-C79) in 2015-2019 were identified from two German claims databases. Patients who received first-line (1 L) treatment within 12 months of index were divided into three mutually exclusive sub-cohorts: platinum-based chemotherapy (PB-CT), non-PB-CT, and immunotherapy (IO). Patient characteristics were assessed during a 24-month baseline period; treatments, HCRU, and costs (of the health insurance fund) per patient-year (ppy) were described during 12-month follow-up.

Results: We identified 3,226 patients with mUC (mean age, 73.8 years; male, 70.8%; mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, 17.6); 1,286 (39.9%) received 1 L treatment within 12 months of index. Of these, 825 (64.2%) received PB-CT, 322 (25.0%) non-PB-CT, and 139 (10.8%) IO. On average, treated patients had 5.1 hospitalizations ppy. Most UC-related hospitalizations ppy were observed in the PB-CT cohort (5.8), followed by the non-PB-CT (4.2) and IO (2.3) cohorts. Mean UC-related hospitalization costs ppy were €22,218 in the treated cohort, €24,294 in PB-CT, €19,079 in IO, and €18,530 in non-PB-CT cohorts. Cancer-related prescription costs ppy averaged €6,323 in treated patients, and €25,955 in IO, €4,318 in non-PB-CT, and €4,270 in PB-CT cohorts.

Limitations: We recognized limitations in our study's sample selection due to unavailable mUC disease status data. We addressed this through an upstream feasibility study conducted in consultation with clinical experts to determine a suitable proxy. Proxies were also used to delineate treatment lines, switches, and discontinuations due to data absence. Furthermore, due to data restrictions, collective dataset analysis was not possible, prompting a meta-analysis for pooled results.

Conclusions: The study shows that mUC is associated with significant HCRU and costs across different types of 1 L systemic therapy.

Keywords: C82; I13; I15; Metastatic urothelial carcinoma; claims data; cost; disease burden; healthcare resource utilization; real-world treatment.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Transitional Cell*
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs
  • Humans
  • Insurance, Health
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms*