Objectives: Use of radial artery as a second arterial graft, compared to a saphenous vein, in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can improve late outcomes. However, the radial artery remains underutilized. We initiated a quality improvement (QI) initiative to increase usage of radial artery grafts.
Methods: During our four-month lead period, we disseminated evidence for radial artery graft usage to surgeons, developed a radial artery decision-making algorithm, and adopted endoscopic harvesting. Our QI initiative was conducted over a six-month period and included a post-operative survey of decision-making for graft selection and obstacles to radial artery usage.
Results: Over the six-month study period, 247 patients received isolated CABG which included 98 (40%) with radial arteries as a second arterial graft and 144 (58%) with greater saphenous vein. Radial artery usage increased with QI initiative implementation by 67% compared to the six-months prior to the study period (60 radial arteries/252 isolated CABG, 24%) (P = 0.006). The survey response rate was 93% (231/247). Barriers to radial artery graft usage were poor quality target vessel or stenosis <80% (24%), patient age >75 years (20%), EF ≤ 35% (8%) and renal insufficiency/dialysis (7%). No patients experienced complications from radial artery harvest.
Conclusions: Our institutional QI initiative was successful in 1) increasing usage of radial artery as a second arterial graft and 2) understanding barriers to radial artery graft usage. Implementation of a QI program can improve radial artery usage in CABG with low risk of patient morbidity from radial artery harvest.
Keywords: CABG; QI; Quality Improvement; coronary artery bypass grafting; graft; radial artery.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.