Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study

Hear Res. 2024 Jun:447:109023. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109023. Epub 2024 Apr 27.

Abstract

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing. Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90-150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4-8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13-30 Hz). In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.

Keywords: Audiovisual speech perception; Cochlear implant; Cortical plasticity; Electrical neuroimaging; Event-related potentials; Theta and beta oscillation power; Top-down attention effects.

MeSH terms

  • Acoustic Stimulation*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Attention*
  • Auditory Cortex / physiopathology
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cochlear Implantation* / instrumentation
  • Cochlear Implants*
  • Deafness* / physiopathology
  • Deafness* / psychology
  • Deafness* / rehabilitation
  • Electroencephalography*
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory
  • Female
  • Hearing
  • Humans
  • Lipreading
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Persons With Hearing Impairments* / psychology
  • Persons With Hearing Impairments* / rehabilitation
  • Photic Stimulation*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Speech Perception*
  • Time Factors
  • Visual Perception