Trauma patients with type O blood exhibit unique multi-omics signature with decreased lectin pathway of complement levels

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 May 15. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004367. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: Patients with type O blood may have an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications due to lower baseline levels of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) and factor VIII, but the transition to a mortality difference in trauma is less clear. We hypothesized that type O trauma patients will have differential proteomic and metabolomic signatures in response to trauma beyond vWF and FVIII alone.

Methods: Patients meeting the highest level of trauma activation criteria were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples were collected upon arrival to the emergency department. Proteomic and metabolomic (multi-omics) analyses of these samples were performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Demographic, clinical, and multi-omics data were compared between patients with type O blood versus all other patients.

Results: There were 288 patients with multi-omics data; 146 (51%) had type O blood. Demographics, injury patterns, and initial vital signs and laboratory measurements were not different between groups. Type O patients had increased lengths of stay (7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.041) and a trend towards decreased mortality secondary to traumatic brain injury compared to other causes (TBI, 44.4 % vs. 87.5%, p = 0.055). Type O patients had decreased levels of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and MBL associated serine proteases 1 and 2 which are required for the initiation of the lectin pathway of complement activation. Type O patients also had metabolite differences signifying energy metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction.

Conclusion: Blood type O patients have a unique multi-omics signature, including decreased levels of proteins required to activate the lectin complement pathway. This may lead to overall decreased levels of complement activation and decreased systemic inflammation in the acute phase possibly leading to a survival advantage, especially in TBI. However, this may later impair healing. Future work will need to confirm these associations, and animal studies are needed to test therapeutic targets.

Level of evidence: Retrospective Comparative Study, Level IV.