Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for more than one hour does not improve the prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of first acute myocardial infarction

Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jan 15;73(2):139-42. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90204-6.

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the prognostic value of predischarge ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring for 1, 6 and 24 hours in 188 patients surviving a first acute myocardial infarction. Ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) were considered as a mean hourly rate or classified using Lown and Moss grading systems. During the 1-year follow-up 20 cardiac deaths occurred. For all 3 monitoring times, a higher number of VPCs/hour and a higher Moss grade were associated with mortality, whereas a Lown grading system gave prognostic information only for the first hour of recording. Monitoring time did not influence specificity or sensitivity in predicting mortality; > or = 3 VPCs/hour showed a higher sensitivity than > or = 10 VPCs/hour (p < 0.05) with a comparable specificity. After 1-hour data entered the model, neither the 6- or the 24-hour data entry improved the overall likelihood ratio statistic, regardless of what VPC grading system was used. These results demonstrate that continuous electrocardiographic recordings of > 1 hour are unnecessary when they are to be used for detecting ventricular arrhythmia as a predictor of mortality in patients surviving a first acute myocardial infarction.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Cardiac Complexes, Premature / diagnosis*
  • Cardiac Complexes, Premature / etiology
  • Cardiac Complexes, Premature / mortality*
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Electrocardiography, Ambulatory*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / complications*
  • Myocardial Infarction / mortality
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Sensitivity and Specificity