Despite the infrequent use in the United States, venous thrombectomy seems to have a beneficial effect in carefully selected patients with acute iliofemoral thrombosis. The final decision to proceed with venous thrombectomy should be based on a balanced analysis of two factors--the characteristics of the thrombus and the characteristics of the patient. First, the diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis must be unequivocally established preoperatively. Accurate anatomic localization is usually achieved with venography, but duplex Doppler examination may be sufficient in selected instances. Second, the distribution of thromboses should be determined. Venous thrombectomy should be considered only in instances of deep vein thrombosis involving the iliofemoral venous segment. Thrombectomy for venous thrombosis below the inguinal ligament has not been consistently beneficial. Third, the age of the thrombus should be estimated. This can usually be accomplished though a careful analysis of the clinical history, but may be corroborated by duplex Doppler or venographic features of the thrombus. Venous thrombectomy should rarely be attempted if the age of the thrombus is thought to be greater than 72 hours. Unfortunately, in many instances the clinical history substantially underestimates the actual age of the underlying thrombus. Fourth, patient characteristics must be assessed preoperatively. While venous thrombectomy can usually be accomplished using local anesthesia, substantial shifts in fluid and acid base balance may be poorly tolerated by elderly, frail patients. In the setting of widespread metastatic disease, rethrombosis rates may be too high to justify thrombectomy in some patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)