Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and conventional angiography in sickle cell disease: clinical significance and reliability

Neuroradiology. 1996 Jul;38(5):409-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00607263.

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and conventional angiograms of 21 patients with known sickle cell disease, who underwent a total of 50 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) studies. MRA and conventional angiography were assessed separately for evidence of stenosis or occlusion. Follow up MRI/MRA studies were also assessed for evidence of progression, regression or stability of the disease in these patients. In the carotid circulation, MRA made the correct diagnosis in 85% of the vessels evaluated with a sensitivity of 80.5% and a specificity of 94%. MRA was also found to show evidence of disease progression, more often than did MRI or the clinical condition of the patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anemia, Sickle Cell / complications*
  • Basilar Artery / diagnostic imaging
  • Basilar Artery / pathology
  • Carotid Arteries / diagnostic imaging
  • Carotid Arteries / pathology
  • Cerebral Angiography*
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders / complications
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders / diagnosis*
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders / diagnostic imaging
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Vertebral Artery / diagnostic imaging
  • Vertebral Artery / pathology