Does distance between home and transplantation center adversely affect patient outcomes after heart transplantation?

J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997 May;16(5):496-503.

Abstract

Background: The emergence of heart transplantation referral centers, in an era of cost-conscious managed care programs, frequently leads to long-distance patient consultation and care. The purpose of this project was to review one center's experience regarding the effect of long distances from home to transplantation hospital on outcomes.

Methods: Three hundred twelve adult, noninternational, transplant recipients surviving at least 3 months were assessed for 10 events: rejection episodes, number of endomyocardial biopsies, emergency department visits, hospital admissions, return to full-time work or school, infections, coronary allograft vasculopathy, malignancies, retransplantation, and death. Presence of a locally involved physician was also determined. Distance from the transplantation center was analyzed in three discrete groups: 0 to 150 miles (n = 207), 151 to 300 miles (n = 69), and >300 miles (n = 36).

Results: There were no differences among the groups in mean length of follow-up (40.6, 36.9, 39.0 months, p = 0.27) or number of biopsies (20.5 +/- 0.16, 18.3 +/- 1.1, 18.0 +/- 1.1, p = 0.07). As the distance increased from the transplantation center, there was no greater incidence of adverse outcomes. Cellular rejection was the same among the groups (45%, 45%, 36%, p = 0.58). Likewise, emergency department visits and hospital admissions also did not vary: (9.7%, 5.8%, 8.3%, p = 0.61) and (22.2%, 13.0%, 16.7%, p = 0.23, respectively). There were no differences in the incidence of coronary vasculopathy (9.2%, 11.6%, 13.9%, p = 0.63). More importantly, the three groups did not differ in death/retransplantation rates (3-year survival, 84.5, 94.0 and 86.9, p = 0.14). Patients cared for by a local physician in addition to their transplant cardiologist had better survival rates than patients without a local physician (3-year survival rate, 90.7 vs 72.6, p = 0.0008).

Conclusions: Long-distance management of heart transplant recipients is successful and is not associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. By itself, distance should not represent a contraindication to transplantation. Patients should be encouraged to maintain contact with a local physician, in addition to the regularly scheduled visits at the transplantation center.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Services Accessibility*
  • Heart Transplantation* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Medically Underserved Area*
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
  • Patient Admission
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Reoperation
  • Survival Analysis
  • Travel*