Pancreatic trauma: a simplified management guideline

J Trauma. 1997 Aug;43(2):234-9; discussion 239-41. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199708000-00005.

Abstract

Introduction: Recent literature supports a conservative trend in the management of pancreatic injuries. Contrary to this trend, some recommend defining ductal integrity by pancreatography, implying that the results alter management. This study examines our recent 5-year experience with a simplified approach to all pancreatic injuries.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients sustaining pancreatic injuries was performed.

Results: One hundred thirty-four patients were identified. Overall mortality was 13%, and pancreatic-related mortality was 2%. Analyses were based on 124 pancreatic injuries among patients who survived >12 hours. Thirty-seven proximal injuries were treated with drainage alone, with a pancreatic morbidity of 11%. Eighty-seven distal pancreatic injuries occurred, 54 with indeterminate ductal status. Twenty-four had high probability for duct injury and were treated by distal resection; 30 with a low probability of ductal injury were drained. Pancreatic morbidity was not different between these groups.

Conclusions: Pancreatic injuries including those with indeterminate ductal status can be successfully managed with low morbidity and mortality using this simplified management protocol.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Algorithms*
  • Decision Trees*
  • Drainage
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Morbidity
  • Pancreas / injuries*
  • Pancreatectomy
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Wounds and Injuries / diagnosis
  • Wounds and Injuries / mortality
  • Wounds and Injuries / therapy