[Preventive treatment of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: from the efficacy of clinical trials to the effectiveness of clinical practice]

Aten Primaria. 1997 Oct 31;20(7):367-71.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Objectives: To know the percentage of patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulants as an approach to the effectiveness of the prophylactic treatment of stroke.

Design: Multicenter observational study.

Setting: Six primary health centers from Barcelona.

Participants: 465 patients with the diagnosed of AF were selected during the second semester of 1996. Patients that had suffered a hemorrhagic stroke, or with mitral stenosis, or with a prosthetic valve, or had hyperthyroidism, or receiving anticoagulant therapy were excluded.

Measurements and main results: 299 patients (64%) were finally included for the analysis. 15.8% of the patients were treated with acenocoumarin, and 35.4% were treated with aspirin. The percentage of patients treated improved for high risk patients (higher than 50%).

Conclusions: The percentage of patients with nonrheumatic AF treated with acenocoumarin or aspirin is low, and physicians might be reluctant to use them because of bleeding complications, compliance with the treatment, or problems of accessibility.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Acenocoumarol / therapeutic use*
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / therapeutic use*
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use*
  • Aspirin / therapeutic use*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / drug therapy*
  • Atrial Fibrillation / prevention & control
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Compliance
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Primary Health Care
  • Spain

Substances

  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Anticoagulants
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Acenocoumarol
  • Aspirin