Cost effectiveness of stent implantation versus PTCA: the BENESTENT experience

Semin Interv Cardiol. 1996 Dec;1(4):263-8.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the costs and effects of stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Data have been taken from both the BENESTENT-I and BENESTENT-II pilot study. Effects are expressed in terms of event-free survival and costs include those of the initial hospitalization and those during follow-up. The costs per additional event-free survivor after 7 months are estimated at Dfl 88,315, Dfl 28,127 and Dfl 6747 using respectively the results from the BENSTENT-I study, the BENESTENT-II pilot study and phase IV of the BENESTENT-II pilot study. Significant decreases in complications and ischaemic events have made stent implantation not only the most favourable in terms of event-free survival but also in terms of cost effectiveness.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / economics*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / economics*
  • Coronary Disease / economics*
  • Coronary Disease / surgery
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Pilot Projects
  • Quality of Life
  • Stents* / economics