Renal function in primary liver transplant recipients receiving neoral (cyclosporine) versus prograf (tacrolimus)

Transplant Proc. 1998 Jun;30(4):1401-2. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(98)00289-9.

Abstract

Immunosuppressive efficacy of Neoral and Prograf following primary hepatic transplantation was comparable. Incidence of rejection episodes, infectious complications, hypertension, and postoperative diabetes mellitus was comparable. Although clinical use of both immunosuppressants was associated with early compromise in renal function, no progressive renal dysfunction was observed.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Azathioprine / therapeutic use
  • Creatinine / blood
  • Cyclosporine / adverse effects
  • Cyclosporine / therapeutic use*
  • Diabetes Mellitus / epidemiology
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Graft Rejection / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / adverse effects
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Incidence
  • Kidney / drug effects*
  • Liver Transplantation / immunology*
  • Liver Transplantation / mortality
  • Liver Transplantation / physiology
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Prednisone / therapeutic use
  • Prospective Studies
  • Regression Analysis
  • Survival Rate
  • Tacrolimus / adverse effects
  • Tacrolimus / therapeutic use*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Cyclosporine
  • Creatinine
  • Azathioprine
  • Prednisone
  • Tacrolimus